Professor John Searl Vindicated by Russian Experiments Confirming Free Energy 1 of 4
Posted by sandman49
All Posts are educational purposes only. Fair Use Clause 107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news, reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholorship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use, the factors to be considered shall include: 1.The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2.the nature of the copyrighted work; 3.the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4.the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. (added pub. I 94-553, Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)
July 25th, 2010 at 5:03 pm
Another claim with no real proof.
July 26th, 2010 at 1:40 am
@blurrybigfoot74 Not claims… facts.
visit w w w,SwallowCommand,com and go through the 950 pages of technical documents, math, diagrams, etc.
Also visit myspace,com/JohnSearlStory and watch all the available videos of the demonstrations, the lectures, go through the pictures, etc.
See it for yourself at the Tesla Technology Conference in New Mexico on Thursday July 29, 2010.
Bring your camera and leave your pride.
August 2nd, 2010 at 4:29 am
Russian Academy of Sciences Commission Against Falsification of Scientific research says Godin and Roschin are pseudoscientist frauds.
August 2nd, 2010 at 2:19 pm
@johan404 And I’m sure that Academy has a financial responsibility to those who Godin and Roschin would put out of business..
I don’t care who says what about ANY one. Have You met Godin and Roschin to discuss this issue yourself?
I encourage people to do so, that way everyone can be on the same page.
Anyone who contradicts the status quo or current paradigm is a fraud, crackpot, pseudoscientist, hoaxer, liar, etc.
Turns out… that’s not the case. And when you leave your armchair you’ll see.
August 2nd, 2010 at 2:58 pm
@TheRealVerbz No I haven’t. In fact, I don’t even know if they really exist as there is no way to contact them by any means except emails that don’t work, and I can’t find any other tangible information on these two guys.
August 2nd, 2010 at 3:30 pm
@johan404 I’ll see what I can do about getting in touch with them. I, myself have never approached them but I’m familiar with some of the work.
It could take quite a while, but I’ll track their ass down and find out the truth of the matter for myself. Then I can provide their contact information to others to either verify or deny what I find. We’ll get um!
August 2nd, 2010 at 3:50 pm
@TheRealVerbz Cool. I do believe ZPE is possible, but there are a lot of perpetual motion scams out there. Infact, most of them are scams, 1 or 2 may be viable. The SEG being one potential candidate.